link: http://bit.ly/1RPGD55
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- My CNBC Asia interview last night: Whole World Has Been Fooled by the Fed’s Con @SchiffGold http://t.co/YcOF0AiN2O
- CEO who raised price of drug by 5000%
- Success At Business Does Not Imply Knowledge of Economics
- The new Federal Reserve chairman said he sees little risk of recession and reaffirmed plans to continue tightening the money supply through interest rate increases and quantitative tightening. http://bit.ly/2t0uYjn
- My latest Newsmax interview: Stock Market 'Very Dangerous' Right Now Due to Fed Antics @SchiffGold https://t.co/Naal2dbZYR
- This new video blog goes out to Scott Nations – It's 2006 All Over Again @SchiffGold http://t.co/ikz3TItPOz
- Peter Schiff, now in 60FPS!
- Anyone dumb enough not to use every legal deduction to minimize his income tax liability is not smart enough to be president!
- Welcome to Obama’s Grand Jobs Recovery: Part-Time Work for Everyone! https://t.co/q5B2MJxscg @SchiffGold
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
synthetic a priori truths
I'm reading Christopher Chase Rachels' new book "A Spontaneous Order", which makes the case for anarcho-capitalism and discusses praxeology and Austrian economics at length. In the first chapter, on praxeology, he claims that Misesian action axioms are the only examples of synthetic a priori truths, but it seems to me that the whole field of mathematics involves synthetic a priori statements. Mathematics is deductive, not inductive, but its a field of inquiry because not all mathematical statements are obvious from the basic definitions of mathematical operations and numbers; they require a lot of work to tease out the implications of these operational rules. Is there something fundamentally different between action axioms and mathematical reasoning?