link: http://bit.ly/1RPGD55
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- #Trump should stop tweeting about how high the stock market is, how great the economy is doing, & taking credit for both. It will backfire!
- "Income Inequality" - What Austrians Understand & Liberals Ignore
- Notice how #JanetYellen does not talk about maintaing price stability, but 2% inflation. Prices rising 2% every year is the new stable!
- Lone Star Tangible Assets will build the facility in the city of Leander, located about 30 miles northwest of Austin. http://bit.ly/2yN9fK6
- Capitalism vs Socialism (economic theory)
- The GFMS report primarily bases its optimistic outlook for gold on overvalued stock markets. http://bit.ly/2zFRVul
- Can entrepreneurs counteract bad government?
- U.S. homeownership rate just fell to 63.4%, its lowest level since 1967, while median monthly rents rose to $804, an all-time record high.
- Fiat currency has led to a massive growth of government,inflation, asset bubbles, and weak economic growth. http://bit.ly/2yo1Pk2
- The True Cost of Higher Education & the Student Debt Crisis (Video) @SchiffGold https://t.co/0thNmsu8pI
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
synthetic a priori truths
I'm reading Christopher Chase Rachels' new book "A Spontaneous Order", which makes the case for anarcho-capitalism and discusses praxeology and Austrian economics at length. In the first chapter, on praxeology, he claims that Misesian action axioms are the only examples of synthetic a priori truths, but it seems to me that the whole field of mathematics involves synthetic a priori statements. Mathematics is deductive, not inductive, but its a field of inquiry because not all mathematical statements are obvious from the basic definitions of mathematical operations and numbers; they require a lot of work to tease out the implications of these operational rules. Is there something fundamentally different between action axioms and mathematical reasoning?