link: http://bit.ly/1RPGD55
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- Information doesn’t matter
- Question about solutions to unemployment/inflation
- We could see a significant increase in the price of silver based on supply and demand fundamentals. http://bit.ly/2z34sZf
- The Theory of Free Banking
- Successful casino developer defends his employees whose paychecks are being “degraded” by healthcare: https://t.co/nXr3r30CWN
- With government making it much harder for entrepreneurs to succeed, Anthony Scaramucci's new book is a must read. https://t.co/hYoihbfxlV
- What are the causes of economic bubbles according to the Austrian School of Economics?
- Unbelievably CNBC claims a weak jobs report vindicates the Fed's not hiking rates in Sept. despite its bluff that it would raise rates soon!
- Steve Wynn says deficit spending is “degrading” America’s standard of living. See what he says about the debates: https://t.co/nXr3r30CWN
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
synthetic a priori truths
I'm reading Christopher Chase Rachels' new book "A Spontaneous Order", which makes the case for anarcho-capitalism and discusses praxeology and Austrian economics at length. In the first chapter, on praxeology, he claims that Misesian action axioms are the only examples of synthetic a priori truths, but it seems to me that the whole field of mathematics involves synthetic a priori statements. Mathematics is deductive, not inductive, but its a field of inquiry because not all mathematical statements are obvious from the basic definitions of mathematical operations and numbers; they require a lot of work to tease out the implications of these operational rules. Is there something fundamentally different between action axioms and mathematical reasoning?