link: http://ift.tt/1Smftqj
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- As Dan Kurz of DK Analytics points out, the federal government would have a difficult time even paying the interest on the debt in a “normalized” interest rate environment. http://bit.ly/2imzvbt http://bit.ly/2k7GtkT
- Discussion forum: The Continuing Relevance of Anthony de Jasay | by Christopher J. Coyne (Sept. 3, 2015)
- China, as well as other countries including Russia, desperately want to reduce their dependence on the dollar. http://bit.ly/2y4vbEo
- Science Isn’t Broken. It’s just a hell of a lot harder than we give it credit for. | by Christie Aschwanden. "..headlines that read 'weak, unreplicated study finds tenuous link between certain vegetables and cancer risk' don’t fly off the newsstands.."
- A Rush to Judge Gold
- My new Gold Videocast @SchiffGold – Rate Hike or No, Dec. Fed Meeting Will Be Bullish for Gold https://t.co/C90E0kSt14
- Top Economists Are Backing Sen. Bernie Sanders on Establishing a $15 an Hour Minimum Wage
- Why Are Republicans So Obsessed With the Gold Standard? - The Atlantic
- I added a video to a @YouTube playlist http://bit.ly/2zaTUXh 🔴 Bitcoin, Gold, and a New Federal Reserve Chair!
- It’s time to get Fed Up with the Central Bank’s latest economic mishandlings. #FedUpFriday https://t.co/4mSAvOz3m9
Sunday, April 24, 2016
Monkey's Paw Economics --- steal this book title
I was [thinking](http://ift.tt/1SmfqL3) about Mises's values-free approach to policy and economic-advocacy, ie: suitability analysis, which he undertook so successfully in Austria as a policy analyst in his various capacities, and there occurred to me a good popular-analogy to explain this approach. Suitability analysis of Austrian economics shows the disconnect between means and ends, and is very similar to the popular trope of the [Monkey's Paw](http://ift.tt/1SmfqL5), or another way to put it is [Be Careful What You Wish For](http://ift.tt/1AOGqXu). It is through suitability analysis that we can show two things, both how and why the means of the mainstream cannot achieve their policy ends, and secondarily what ends a policy is in fact likely to achieve and thus often make the very problem worse that was aimed at being improved or solved. I think with this analogy we have a good hook into the mind and interest of the average reader, and this theme could be developed strongly for a popular audience with the kinds of examples that Austrian economists have long developed over the years. But, as I am not credentialed and otherwise busy, I hope one of you will be inspired by this and take it up. Cheers :)