link: http://ift.tt/1pMiIwt
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- The government wants to check my cat
- Ep. 279: My Take On Joe Rogan Redo: http://bit.ly/2xkmtxP via @YouTube
- Crushing Myths and Building a New Case for Gold: Gold Videocast with Albert K Luhttp://bit.ly/1PWtbdw @SchiffGold
- The relationship between gold and interest rates is not what conventional wisdom would have you believe. http://bit.ly/2yF3ltL http://bit.ly/2ARZcJ1
- What do you think that Greece should do?
- Politicians are basically tone-deaf. http://bit.ly/2xzueim
- Consumers are voters. They’re voting for Trump & Sanders because they’re not confident in the economy https://t.co/VofjaZxuc1 @SchiffGold
- Sanford Ikeda,“The Misesian Paradox: Interventionism Is Not Sustainable” (March 2016)
- @roysebag Can't today. I'm doing CNCB at 5PM talking about gold --You should watch. Then I have dinner plans. It's my birthday.
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
Friday, March 25, 2016
What is your opinion on Reaganomics?
It is often claimed that the statistics prove that Reaganomics failed. It is also claimed (by different people who claim the former) that Reaganomics was the closest the US has come to implementing an Austrian type approach to economic policy. If both claims are true then why should we keep trying to implement these types of policies, such as decreased taxes, other than for the moral reasons which we all are aware of. And if one, or both, of the claims are false, why ? I am posing this question out of curiosity to what this community thinks. I am not advocating that one or both claims are true or false.