link: http://ift.tt/1pMiIwt
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- As Yellen and the Fed stick with rate hike goals, new members will make their current stance irrelevant: https://t.co/IOGEcgrJL2
- What are the causes of economic bubbles according to the Austrian School of Economics?
- I added a video to a @YouTube playlist http://bit.ly/2yublSz 🔴 US Economy: Where We Are Right Now
- RT @tomselliott: If you're not concerned about Trump's fascist tendencies, what about his incestuous ones? https://t.co/GPeDGBdCeH
- Gold scams are pretty easy to detect if you simply look at things with a critical eye. http://bit.ly/2fXQ9wy
- Keynsians- how do they defend using CPI when consumer product qualities change? And this is linked to the value of money, which they adjust for inflation, but based on quality of products included in CPI.
- Liberating Praxeology from Anthropocentrism
- It's been a busy 2016. Here's all my major interviews of the past two weeks. @SchiffGold https://t.co/GrOy2fOyOu
- I added a video to a @YouTube playlist http://bit.ly/2tHb4Wz 🔴 Federal Reserve Has a Fall Guy in Donald Trump
Friday, March 25, 2016
What is your opinion on Reaganomics?
It is often claimed that the statistics prove that Reaganomics failed. It is also claimed (by different people who claim the former) that Reaganomics was the closest the US has come to implementing an Austrian type approach to economic policy. If both claims are true then why should we keep trying to implement these types of policies, such as decreased taxes, other than for the moral reasons which we all are aware of. And if one, or both, of the claims are false, why ? I am posing this question out of curiosity to what this community thinks. I am not advocating that one or both claims are true or false.