link: http://ift.tt/1Nd2J1f
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- What do you think that Greece should do?
- #Republicans show their true big government colors in that the only automatic trigger they will even consider to offset larger future deficits is one that raises taxes not one that cuts spending!
- Crushing Myths and Building a New Case for Gold: Gold Videocast with Albert K Luhttp://bit.ly/1PWtbdw @SchiffGold
- #StockMarket futures getting killed. Tomorrow is not looking good, as I warned earlier today in my podcast. #Gold starting to move up. The rocket ship is about to leave the platform just as #Bitcoin comes crashing back down to earth.
- Can the market sustain the rally? That all depends on what investors think the Fed will do next. http://bit.ly/2mAovsh
- U.S. home sales approach eight-and-a-half-year high, prices surge
- Monopoly’s New Era by Joseph E. Stiglitz
- @gthomaske This relates to the future not the past
- Inflows of gold into ETFs over the last two years reverse a 3-year trend of outflows between 2013 and 2015. http://bit.ly/2nzrmCc
- For the first time in several months, North American funds saw the biggest increase. US-listed ETFs accounted for 73% of global net inflows in January, reversing the 2017 trend in which European funds dominated net inflows. http://bit.ly/2FWnaRe
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Economic Effects of Subsidization
How would you explain how a subsidy leads to net economic losses for consumers as a whole? I seem to get that it would arbitrarily direct resources to to economically arbitrary things at the expense of things actually desired by consumers, but is that the only way of looking at it because this never works on leftists. Suppose a leftist claimed that since health care service x currently cost $100, he wanted to means test people to qualify for a $50 subsidy toward the service. What would happen/how is the net economic loss best described? Channel your inner Bastiat.