link: http://ift.tt/1Nd2J1f
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- The Marshallian Synthesis
- Dudas expects silver to hit a target of around $19.20 in 2018. That would represent a 16.7% increase from the current price. http://bit.ly/2irghBi
- Unbelievably CNBC claims a weak jobs report vindicates the Fed's not hiking rates in Sept. despite its bluff that it would raise rates soon!
- Gold Standard Myths; It’s all about Power @SchiffGold https://t.co/JPnL1WVLbc
- American Silver Eagle Sales Break Record. Sales total for 2015 will be between 45 and 47 million ounces. @SchiffGold https://t.co/GegG8jGDCd
- Dr. Ron Paul: The People Vote for Gold All the Time (Video) @SchiffGold https://t.co/7PEzIeZogj
- Negative Interest Rates: A Golden Opportunity http://bit.ly/1S3gZJk @SchiffGold
- @realDonaldTrump Too bad #Republicans won't cut government spending so that Americans can have real tax cuts instead of the fraudulent one they are being sold. This fake tax cut, despite being small, will lead to larger deficits, higher inflation, rising interest rates, and future tax increases!
- A classic: Murray Rothbard responds to Reaganomics
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Economic Effects of Subsidization
How would you explain how a subsidy leads to net economic losses for consumers as a whole? I seem to get that it would arbitrarily direct resources to to economically arbitrary things at the expense of things actually desired by consumers, but is that the only way of looking at it because this never works on leftists. Suppose a leftist claimed that since health care service x currently cost $100, he wanted to means test people to qualify for a $50 subsidy toward the service. What would happen/how is the net economic loss best described? Channel your inner Bastiat.