link: http://ift.tt/1Nd2J1f
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- Drop in Gold Output Expected as Mining Companies Lose Money @SchiffGold http://t.co/99AYQaC37g
- I added a video to a @YouTube playlist http://bit.ly/2tHb4Wz 🔴 Federal Reserve Has a Fall Guy in Donald Trump
- What Happened When One Company Set a Minimum Wage of $70,000
- The US Is Already in a Recession; Get Ready for Some Crazy Monetary Policy https://t.co/AEiTmQxmT7 @SchiffGold
- 🔴 Ep. 315: 2017 GDP Growth Looks like Obama 2.0: http://bit.ly/2CRziVM via @YouTube
- The governor of Puerto Rico is asking for a $5 billion loan. But Puerto Rico already has over $70 billion in debt it can't repay!
- Knowing the difference between currency and money is critical to making smart decisions about preserving wealth: https://t.co/lFjOYROT4I
- If an investor is looking to spread risk across thier portfolio, gold and silver are ideal choices. http://bit.ly/2uGId5Q
- July report “Investors Better Listen when Markets Talk!" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Economic Effects of Subsidization
How would you explain how a subsidy leads to net economic losses for consumers as a whole? I seem to get that it would arbitrarily direct resources to to economically arbitrary things at the expense of things actually desired by consumers, but is that the only way of looking at it because this never works on leftists. Suppose a leftist claimed that since health care service x currently cost $100, he wanted to means test people to qualify for a $50 subsidy toward the service. What would happen/how is the net economic loss best described? Channel your inner Bastiat.