link: http://ift.tt/1Nd2J1f
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- Successful casino developer defends his employees whose paychecks are being “degraded” by healthcare: https://t.co/nXr3r30CWN
- What are the causes of economic bubbles according to the Austrian School of Economics?
- Liberating Praxeology from Anthropocentrism
- Investment newsletters? Anyone have any investment newsletters they subscribe to? Like Marc Faber?
- Which States Rely Most on Federal Spending?
- RT @tomselliott: If you're not concerned about Trump's fascist tendencies, what about his incestuous ones? https://t.co/GPeDGBdCeH
- The #WSJ claims #gold prices will fall as the metal lacks intrinsic value. What intrinsic value does the WSJ find in paper money?
- Gold has certain features that lends itself really well to tech. http://bit.ly/2hjdZ37
- It's been a busy 2016. Here's all my major interviews of the past two weeks. @SchiffGold https://t.co/GrOy2fOyOu
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Economic Effects of Subsidization
How would you explain how a subsidy leads to net economic losses for consumers as a whole? I seem to get that it would arbitrarily direct resources to to economically arbitrary things at the expense of things actually desired by consumers, but is that the only way of looking at it because this never works on leftists. Suppose a leftist claimed that since health care service x currently cost $100, he wanted to means test people to qualify for a $50 subsidy toward the service. What would happen/how is the net economic loss best described? Channel your inner Bastiat.