link: http://ift.tt/1XuSw2U
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- Is there a term for the opposite of unemployment rate?
- Gold Is Simplest Diversifier Against Overvalued US Dollar & Stocks (Video) @SchiffGold https://t.co/lJjIhaqJ0c
- @Awyee707 They have it backwards. Growing economies increase production, which kips a lid on prices, or causes them to fall. Weak economies result in less production and higher prices.
- #Trump should stop tweeting about how high the stock market is, how great the economy is doing, & taking credit for both. It will backfire!
- Why are markets so excited about the Atlanta Fed's Q2 GDP forecast? If it's as accurate as their Q1 prediction we are likely in recession!
- As Yellen and the Fed stick with rate hike goals, new members will make their current stance irrelevant: https://t.co/IOGEcgrJL2
- The fake bars were primarily made of nickel or copper, and contained only about $1 in gold. http://bit.ly/2nZThv1
- Does your wallet feel lighter after taxes? The tax man cometh. And he'll be back. http://bit.ly/2pWQ7nZ
- The World Gold Council called it the “biggest fiscal reform since India’s liberalization in the early 1990s.” http://bit.ly/2rmTftX
- India governor Y.V. Reddy says "It seems highly inappropriate to discourage gold imports, which meet women’s needs" http://bit.ly/2tX0E9h
Thursday, November 26, 2015
I wanted feedback on this idea.
I have a concept in my head for a digital currency that distributes dividends based on velocity. Now let's say every transaction had a 1% deposit on both ends that automatically distributed the money to all users immediately and unconditionally without any bureaucratic meddling. This would be enough to phase out welfare and social security in the long run. Depending on velocity it could be anywhere between $10 and $90 a day. This would be a natural pigovian tax on fractional reserve lending to pay for the inflation they're creating. Money laundering, capital flight, paying off debt with debt and other harmfully redundant bureaucratic schemes would pay for damage to the economy. NYSE crash bots would be prohibitively expensive. I suppose it would be fair to call this a redistribution scheme, but it wouldn't be fair to call this class warfare. It's about as egalitarian as it gets. Everybody pays 1% when money changes hands, no ifs ands or buts, both deadbeat and bankster alike. Please be my guest and tear this apart. I'd like to hear your take on it and hear what folly this may entail.