link: http://ift.tt/1LiFCi2
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- Steve Wynn says deficit spending is “degrading” America’s standard of living. See what he says about the debates: https://t.co/nXr3r30CWN
- Somaliland's Private Sector at a Crossroads
- What are the causes of economic bubbles according to the Austrian School of Economics?
- Would you let your cat play with a 9 grand on a ball of yarn? http://bit.ly/2ArHoQ7
- VOXEU: Leveraged bubbles
- Dow Jones down 6% from its highs & falling fast. How much more will it fall before the Fed stops pretending the data supports a rate hike?
- Why own gold? A lot of people claim buying gold doesn’t make any sense. http://bit.ly/2xvpsUu
- The Austrian theory of the business cycle continues its comeback
- Before any more money can be loaned to Puerto Rico, existing debt must be restructured, and largely repudiated.
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
Trade Deficit of the US vis a vis China/Japan...
I have always had difficulty understanding the mechanics of this phenomenon. Let me start with the following quote from wikipedia.. >Since the mid-1980s, the United States has had a growing deficit in tradeable goods, especially with Asian nations (China and Japan) which now hold large sums of U.S debt that has funded the consumption.[5][6] The U.S. has a trade surplus with nations such as Australia. The issue of trade deficits can be complex. To stupid old me, this is confusing. It paints the picture of the Chinese government buying treasuries (US debt) and giving the US government toasters. But governments don't exchange currency for toasters. Private merchants exchange currency for toasters. Can someone trace the mechanics of this "trade deficit" out so I can understand what's going on? How does the Chinese government end up with stockpiled dollars and the US government end up with citizens who have consumed a bunch of toasters without having to work so relatively hard for them?