link: http://bit.ly/1IZTNbn
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- By not answering the question, #Clinton avoided stating whether the Constitution means what it says, or what justices pretend it says.
- Ep. 294: 30-Year Anniversary of the 1987 Stock Market Crash: http://bit.ly/2yB1FEO via @YouTube
- Jim Grant: The Fed Is in the Business of Making Things Worse https://t.co/2jaNi6TdGP @SchiffGold
- Gold has actually outpaced stocks in 2017. Now the mainstream is starting to sit up and take notice. http://bit.ly/2wMfFM7
- Sanford Ikeda,“The Misesian Paradox: Interventionism Is Not Sustainable” (March 2016)
- Ep. 310: Swamp 2, People 0: http://bit.ly/2yJtgk3 via @YouTube
- Ep. 279: My Take On Joe Rogan Redo: http://bit.ly/2xkmtxP via @YouTube
- Excellent Comic Strip Explains Our Situation
- What do you think that Greece should do?
- You’ve got two politicians standing on top of $200 billion in gold – in the dark. http://bit.ly/2xzueim
Monday, August 17, 2015
Is there an "Austrian debunk" anywhere for Krugman's texts?
I am doubtful but figure it can't hurt to ask. I ain't knockin' on the textbooks that hard -- I hear the micro book is understandably free from Keynesian bias, and the macro book has more than a few decent aspects too. I have no problem with other points of view; in fact, although I am conceptually quite sympathetic, I haven't done enough reading to decide to what extent I agree with what I know of every aspect of the Austrian school. Instead, it has more to do with the fact that although I didn't read them with an uncritical eye, the macro certainly does have at least some bias, and there's the chance I may have absorbed opinion as fact--and that's never good, but especially unfortunate when talking about such a intellectually bankrupt figure as Krugman.