link: http://bit.ly/1RPGD55
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- The Aug. Empire State Manufacturing Index plunged to -14.92, its lowest level since April 2009, missing expectations by the most since 2010!
- #Obama peddling more fiction. He's taking credit for job creation when 88% of jobs created in Fed. were part-time, & 80% paid minimum wage!
- "Despite the fact that I support Trump over Hillary, I think Trump really blew an opportunity with this debate.” https://t.co/sKlJyu2pCG
- Peter Schiff, now in 60FPS!
- "Bernie Sanders on Minimum Wage" - Why are these wrong?
- In memory of my father Irwin Schiff, who died 1 year ago today, listen to this radio show aired on Father' Day 2005. https://t.co/dpLBvG6CZu
- MF Global: Heed the Warning https://t.co/hqLGtrISku @SchiffGold
- Check out my interview about gold, inflation, and government propaganda on MSNBC http://bit.ly/1IzU4VE
- @Carl_C_Icahn You're right but your analogy is wrong. The Fed has not been giving the economy medicine, but administering monetary heroine!
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
synthetic a priori truths
I'm reading Christopher Chase Rachels' new book "A Spontaneous Order", which makes the case for anarcho-capitalism and discusses praxeology and Austrian economics at length. In the first chapter, on praxeology, he claims that Misesian action axioms are the only examples of synthetic a priori truths, but it seems to me that the whole field of mathematics involves synthetic a priori statements. Mathematics is deductive, not inductive, but its a field of inquiry because not all mathematical statements are obvious from the basic definitions of mathematical operations and numbers; they require a lot of work to tease out the implications of these operational rules. Is there something fundamentally different between action axioms and mathematical reasoning?