link: http://bit.ly/1RPGD55
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- June report "Do You wish to live like a Laissez-Faire Capitalist or be ruled by Interventionists?" published. https://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- @realDonaldTrump So after you are about to sign a bill to substantial reduce government revenue, you now wan't to sign another one to substantially increase spending. Crippling the economy with more debt is not for the good of the country!
- The Dow Jones drops 1,000 points on the open. Is Janet Yellen getting ready to blink on rates yet?
- India Driving
- According to CNBC, Goldman Sachs was hit the hardest recording its worst commodities quarter ever. http://bit.ly/2vnNZtc
- (1/2) Global stock markets are now nearly as oversold as at the market low in October 1987. Expect a powerful and tradable rally of 20% or so from here. Cover all shorts and go long the most oversold stocks. However, do not expect new highs.
- Billionaire investor Paul Singer said the trust the central planners is misplaced. http://bit.ly/2rU3cAG
- April report "On the Road to Perdition" published. https://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- Instead of giving the free market control of health care, we are left with an even more broken Obamacare. https://t.co/yJGEAnWNSj
- Scientists are developing ways to use gold to kill cancer cells, improve the efficiency of solar cells and catalyze chemical reactions. http://bit.ly/2jUFlNT http://bit.ly/2AYLR13
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
synthetic a priori truths
I'm reading Christopher Chase Rachels' new book "A Spontaneous Order", which makes the case for anarcho-capitalism and discusses praxeology and Austrian economics at length. In the first chapter, on praxeology, he claims that Misesian action axioms are the only examples of synthetic a priori truths, but it seems to me that the whole field of mathematics involves synthetic a priori statements. Mathematics is deductive, not inductive, but its a field of inquiry because not all mathematical statements are obvious from the basic definitions of mathematical operations and numbers; they require a lot of work to tease out the implications of these operational rules. Is there something fundamentally different between action axioms and mathematical reasoning?