link: http://bit.ly/1RPGD55
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- 'Equal is Unfair' -A review of the new book that takes on modern Leftism.
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- #JanetYellen claims the Fed's job is to help create jobs. How does printing money, buying bonds,and manipulating interest rates create jobs?
- Is anyone currently trying to create a simulation or game which emulates the economy according to this school?
- Think and Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill Cartoon Book Review
- A healthy monsoon season is showing an uptick in Indian farmers returning to the gold market to buy: https://t.co/KSA87hfWvw
- Can you describe the causes of economic crisis in accordance with Austrian economics?
- praxeology and rationalism
- India's recent monsoons are only one reason analysists and financial experts are bullish for gold in Q4 and 2017:… https://t.co/XcNUJ3T9iy
- It’s not just the White House with economists on the payroll. Nearly every government agency has somebody on staff giving economic advice. And what has it gotten us? Trillions of dollars in debt. http://bit.ly/2DbGc4e
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
synthetic a priori truths
I'm reading Christopher Chase Rachels' new book "A Spontaneous Order", which makes the case for anarcho-capitalism and discusses praxeology and Austrian economics at length. In the first chapter, on praxeology, he claims that Misesian action axioms are the only examples of synthetic a priori truths, but it seems to me that the whole field of mathematics involves synthetic a priori statements. Mathematics is deductive, not inductive, but its a field of inquiry because not all mathematical statements are obvious from the basic definitions of mathematical operations and numbers; they require a lot of work to tease out the implications of these operational rules. Is there something fundamentally different between action axioms and mathematical reasoning?