link: http://bit.ly/1RPGD55
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- Steve Wynn says deficit spending is “degrading” America’s standard of living. See what he says about the debates: https://t.co/nXr3r30CWN
- Somaliland's Private Sector at a Crossroads
- Why own gold? A lot of people claim buying gold doesn’t make any sense. http://bit.ly/2xvpsUu
- What are the causes of economic bubbles according to the Austrian School of Economics?
- Would you let your cat play with a 9 grand on a ball of yarn? http://bit.ly/2ArHoQ7
- Thank you! I will recommend Telegraph dating to friends and colleagues 6AWDL7nw
- My CNBC Asia interview last night: Whole World Has Been Fooled by the Fed’s Con @SchiffGold http://t.co/YcOF0AiN2O
- VOXEU: Leveraged bubbles
- The Austrian theory of the business cycle continues its comeback
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
synthetic a priori truths
I'm reading Christopher Chase Rachels' new book "A Spontaneous Order", which makes the case for anarcho-capitalism and discusses praxeology and Austrian economics at length. In the first chapter, on praxeology, he claims that Misesian action axioms are the only examples of synthetic a priori truths, but it seems to me that the whole field of mathematics involves synthetic a priori statements. Mathematics is deductive, not inductive, but its a field of inquiry because not all mathematical statements are obvious from the basic definitions of mathematical operations and numbers; they require a lot of work to tease out the implications of these operational rules. Is there something fundamentally different between action axioms and mathematical reasoning?