link: http://ift.tt/1pMiIwt
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- November report "Is it True, as David Hume (1711 – 1776) postulated that, "Nothing is esteemed a more certain sign of the flourishing conditions of any nation than the lowness of interest"?" published. https://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- http://bit.ly/2xuyNea
- Some have speculated Germany wants the gold at home in the event of a breakup of the EU and a collapse of the euro. http://bit.ly/2xfQO0f
- Sexy girls for hot sex here yQ_2_9Mm
- JP Morgan does not understand that it's not just about where interest rates are now that is the problem, but about how much higher they are going, and how quickly they will get there!
- Puerto Rico Is the Only Place in World where Americans Can Be Free (Video) @SchiffGold http://bit.ly/1PBTGHv
- The Bigger the Bubble, The Fewer People See It
- Russia has passed China to become the world’s fifth-largest gold-holding country. http://bit.ly/2CJzi6l
- Fed Up Friday – The markets may be betting for a Fed rate hike that will never arrive: https://t.co/jdHrYJEEwK https://t.co/4XtNUhZO7D
- If Spending Is Our Military Strategy, Our Strategy Is Bankrupt
Friday, March 25, 2016
What is your opinion on Reaganomics?
It is often claimed that the statistics prove that Reaganomics failed. It is also claimed (by different people who claim the former) that Reaganomics was the closest the US has come to implementing an Austrian type approach to economic policy. If both claims are true then why should we keep trying to implement these types of policies, such as decreased taxes, other than for the moral reasons which we all are aware of. And if one, or both, of the claims are false, why ? I am posing this question out of curiosity to what this community thinks. I am not advocating that one or both claims are true or false.