link: http://ift.tt/1pMiIwt
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- 'Equal is Unfair' -A review of the new book that takes on modern Leftism.
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- #JanetYellen claims the Fed's job is to help create jobs. How does printing money, buying bonds,and manipulating interest rates create jobs?
- Is anyone currently trying to create a simulation or game which emulates the economy according to this school?
- Think and Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill Cartoon Book Review
- India's recent monsoons are only one reason analysists and financial experts are bullish for gold in Q4 and 2017:… https://t.co/XcNUJ3T9iy
- My CNBC interview from earlier today. Defending my record against Scott Nations. @SchiffGold http://t.co/1N2ThX4rmf
- A healthy monsoon season is showing an uptick in Indian farmers returning to the gold market to buy: https://t.co/KSA87hfWvw
- Can you describe the causes of economic crisis in accordance with Austrian economics?
- Pay Is Stagnant for Vast Majority, Even When You Include Benefits
Friday, March 25, 2016
What is your opinion on Reaganomics?
It is often claimed that the statistics prove that Reaganomics failed. It is also claimed (by different people who claim the former) that Reaganomics was the closest the US has come to implementing an Austrian type approach to economic policy. If both claims are true then why should we keep trying to implement these types of policies, such as decreased taxes, other than for the moral reasons which we all are aware of. And if one, or both, of the claims are false, why ? I am posing this question out of curiosity to what this community thinks. I am not advocating that one or both claims are true or false.