link: http://ift.tt/1pMiIwt
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- What If Batman Was From Chennai? | Put Chutney
- South India 101 - The Banana Leaf | Put Chutney
- WSJ Fed mouthpiece John #Hilsenrath just reported #theFed is unlikely to raise rates in 2015. Anyone who listens to me knew this in Jan.
- O Haseena Lagdi Katrina HD Full Song | Naughty Jatts | Neeru Bajwa, Arya Babbar, Roshan Prince
- Epistemological foundation for AE
- At 2.95% the yield on 10-year treasuries is the highest since July of 2011. That is not quite 7 years ago. But if yields go back to where they were in April 2010, just over 8 years ago, they will hit 4%. If me made it this far what's to stop the trend from continuing?
- The #dollar sell off continues. The dollar index just broke below 89, and the dollar is down to 6.33 against the Chinese yuan, on its way to record low. Gold is up another 6 bucks, trading above $1,363.
- RT @GrabienMedia: VIDEO - @HillaryClinton: ‘I Am Going to Make Some Employers Go To Jail for Wage Theft’ http://t.co/5zA4hgWAHE
- According to the WGC, gold has become more of a mainstream investment option. Investment demand for the yellow metal has grown an average of 18% per year since 2001. http://bit.ly/2DBybKr
- Varanasi & Sarnath, India (in HD)
Friday, March 25, 2016
What is your opinion on Reaganomics?
It is often claimed that the statistics prove that Reaganomics failed. It is also claimed (by different people who claim the former) that Reaganomics was the closest the US has come to implementing an Austrian type approach to economic policy. If both claims are true then why should we keep trying to implement these types of policies, such as decreased taxes, other than for the moral reasons which we all are aware of. And if one, or both, of the claims are false, why ? I am posing this question out of curiosity to what this community thinks. I am not advocating that one or both claims are true or false.