link: http://ift.tt/1pMiIwt
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- Gold Is Simplest Diversifier Against Overvalued US Dollar & Stocks (Video) @SchiffGold https://t.co/lJjIhaqJ0c
- The US Treasury Department plans to auction off around $1.4 trillion in Treasuries this year. Who will buy them? Because the biggest purchasers of US debt aren’t in a buying mood. http://bit.ly/2BrevY1
- Why are markets so excited about the Atlanta Fed's Q2 GDP forecast? If it's as accurate as their Q1 prediction we are likely in recession!
- Or did the Clinton machine get Comey's mind right just in the nick of time?
- December Market Commentary "The more Politician promise Change the more Things stay the same." published. https://t.co/M2NoQayrz5
- Deflationary spiral in a commodity based currency
- According to the 2018 World Economic League Table, India will leapfrog France and England in 2018 to become the world’s 5th largest economy in dollar terms.http://bit.ly/2lcG916
- JP Morgan: Gold Entering a New and Long Bull Market https://t.co/1warfOcDH4 @SchiffGold
- With low rates and inflation on the rise, 2017 could still support a healthy economy for gold:… http://bit.ly/2f9w6pM
- Is there a term for the opposite of unemployment rate?
Friday, March 25, 2016
What is your opinion on Reaganomics?
It is often claimed that the statistics prove that Reaganomics failed. It is also claimed (by different people who claim the former) that Reaganomics was the closest the US has come to implementing an Austrian type approach to economic policy. If both claims are true then why should we keep trying to implement these types of policies, such as decreased taxes, other than for the moral reasons which we all are aware of. And if one, or both, of the claims are false, why ? I am posing this question out of curiosity to what this community thinks. I am not advocating that one or both claims are true or false.