link: http://ift.tt/1oO9pvL
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- #JanetYellen said there is a 0% chance that the Fed would raise short-term interest rates more than expected without rapid economic growth.
- Myths about the "owners of capital"
- Al Gore still has not accepted the results of the 2000 election and the media has never had a problem with that!
- What are the main features of modern economic crises?
- It's not the global economy that worries the Fed, but the U.S. bubble economy. The Fed is afraid to prick that bubble by raising rates.
- India's recent monsoons are only one reason analysists and financial experts are bullish for gold in Q4 and 2017:… https://t.co/XcNUJ3T9iy
- It’s not just the White House with economists on the payroll. Nearly every government agency has somebody on staff giving economic advice. And what has it gotten us? Trillions of dollars in debt. http://bit.ly/2DbGc4e
- Satoshi Nakamoto nominated for the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences - Talks about Early Austrians
- #JanetYellen denies the Fed is concerned about the stock market, or that it considers the market when deciding on interest rates. Yeah right
- When polled by the WSJ, mainstream economists agree with me – this rate hike won't stick. @SchiffGold https://t.co/m99oXDelen
Saturday, February 27, 2016
What are good ways to learn more about opposing schools of thought in sme detail?
I'm familar with only the very basics of Keynsian theory and Marxism. Really, AD/AS, and LTV. Their founders, however, each filled tomes with their ideas. And it's worth learning more of their arguments--after all, you can't criticize them effectively without a solid understanding of them. To this end, what's a good way of learning more of either? Possible difficulty: I'm not an economist by trade or training; I've only had Intro to Macro and Micro. So I'm unfortunately unable to follow high-level arguments. Is there anything out there you know of that would fit this need for me? I'm doubtful myself, but figured it couldn't hurt to ask. I did see the History of Economic Thought links in the sidebar, but it doesn't look at if those are likely to go into sufficient depth, though they may be a good starting place.