link: http://ift.tt/1oO9pvL
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- Drop in Gold Output Expected as Mining Companies Lose Money @SchiffGold http://t.co/99AYQaC37g
- The US Is Already in a Recession; Get Ready for Some Crazy Monetary Policy https://t.co/AEiTmQxmT7 @SchiffGold
- CEO who raised price of drug by 5000%
- The Aug. Empire State Manufacturing Index plunged to -14.92, its lowest level since April 2009, missing expectations by the most since 2010!
- Dow Jones down 6% from its highs & falling fast. How much more will it fall before the Fed stops pretending the data supports a rate hike?
- 🔴 Ep. 315: 2017 GDP Growth Looks like Obama 2.0: http://bit.ly/2CRziVM via @YouTube
- The governor of Puerto Rico is asking for a $5 billion loan. But Puerto Rico already has over $70 billion in debt it can't repay!
- My latest podcast: FOMC Minutes Confirm Fed Rate Hike Rocket Not Ready For Sept. Liftoff @SchiffGold http://bit.ly/1UVsBCd
- Question: If the Fed is about to interest raise rates how will they prevent the stock market from crashing? Answer: By not raising rates!
Saturday, February 27, 2016
What are good ways to learn more about opposing schools of thought in sme detail?
I'm familar with only the very basics of Keynsian theory and Marxism. Really, AD/AS, and LTV. Their founders, however, each filled tomes with their ideas. And it's worth learning more of their arguments--after all, you can't criticize them effectively without a solid understanding of them. To this end, what's a good way of learning more of either? Possible difficulty: I'm not an economist by trade or training; I've only had Intro to Macro and Micro. So I'm unfortunately unable to follow high-level arguments. Is there anything out there you know of that would fit this need for me? I'm doubtful myself, but figured it couldn't hurt to ask. I did see the History of Economic Thought links in the sidebar, but it doesn't look at if those are likely to go into sufficient depth, though they may be a good starting place.