link: http://ift.tt/1Nd2J1f
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- Drop in Gold Output Expected as Mining Companies Lose Money @SchiffGold http://t.co/99AYQaC37g
- The US Is Already in a Recession; Get Ready for Some Crazy Monetary Policy https://t.co/AEiTmQxmT7 @SchiffGold
- CEO who raised price of drug by 5000%
- Dow Jones down 6% from its highs & falling fast. How much more will it fall before the Fed stops pretending the data supports a rate hike?
- 🔴 Ep. 315: 2017 GDP Growth Looks like Obama 2.0: http://bit.ly/2CRziVM via @YouTube
- The governor of Puerto Rico is asking for a $5 billion loan. But Puerto Rico already has over $70 billion in debt it can't repay!
- Question: If the Fed is about to interest raise rates how will they prevent the stock market from crashing? Answer: By not raising rates!
- Knowing the difference between currency and money is critical to making smart decisions about preserving wealth: https://t.co/lFjOYROT4I
- WSJ Fed mouthpiece John #Hilsenrath just reported #theFed is unlikely to raise rates in 2015. Anyone who listens to me knew this in Jan.
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Economic Effects of Subsidization
How would you explain how a subsidy leads to net economic losses for consumers as a whole? I seem to get that it would arbitrarily direct resources to to economically arbitrary things at the expense of things actually desired by consumers, but is that the only way of looking at it because this never works on leftists. Suppose a leftist claimed that since health care service x currently cost $100, he wanted to means test people to qualify for a $50 subsidy toward the service. What would happen/how is the net economic loss best described? Channel your inner Bastiat.