link: http://ift.tt/1XuSw2U
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- Uncle Sam isn’t the only one running up credit card debts. Everyday Americans are also piling on the debt. Total household debt soared to a record $13 trillion dollars in 2017. http://bit.ly/2nWl8Kw
- #Trump's economic fantasy is that since the U.S. economy is getting stronger and stronger, the U.S. dollar will get stronger too. The reality is that the big, fat, ugly bubble is getting bigger and bigger, and as the air comes out the dollar will get weaker and weaker!
- British Pouring Up to Half of Their Net-Worth Into Gold Post-Brexit https://t.co/2wS71sKdAn
- So, why does Gartman have faith the gold bulls will continue to run? Central bank policy. http://bit.ly/2xyUI58
- Dartmouth Remarks On the Minimum Wage
- Preparing for Children’s Fashion Photo Shoots - Advice from a Family Portrait Photographer
- Gold is up 13% on the year. Why are investors buying gold? http://bit.ly/2sDwd3T
- Trump has found imposing his will in D.C. isn’t as easy as Trump tower. http://bit.ly/2sga9Pj
- #HarveyWeinstein may be sick, but he does not suffer from a disease. He is neither a sex addict nor a victim. Just an ass with an excuse!
- Jim Rickards: Dynamics in Place for $10,000 Gold https://t.co/X0jwMoScpB @SchiffGold
Thursday, November 26, 2015
I wanted feedback on this idea.
I have a concept in my head for a digital currency that distributes dividends based on velocity. Now let's say every transaction had a 1% deposit on both ends that automatically distributed the money to all users immediately and unconditionally without any bureaucratic meddling. This would be enough to phase out welfare and social security in the long run. Depending on velocity it could be anywhere between $10 and $90 a day. This would be a natural pigovian tax on fractional reserve lending to pay for the inflation they're creating. Money laundering, capital flight, paying off debt with debt and other harmfully redundant bureaucratic schemes would pay for damage to the economy. NYSE crash bots would be prohibitively expensive. I suppose it would be fair to call this a redistribution scheme, but it wouldn't be fair to call this class warfare. It's about as egalitarian as it gets. Everybody pays 1% when money changes hands, no ifs ands or buts, both deadbeat and bankster alike. Please be my guest and tear this apart. I'd like to hear your take on it and hear what folly this may entail.