link: http://ift.tt/1XuSw2U
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- Carl Menger: Founder of the Austrian School
- Though #gold and #silver prices are approaching 2-year highs, and mining stocks are hitting 3-year highs, typical investors have yet to buy!
- David Stockman: We believe strongly that a bond market ‘yield shock’ will be the crash-trigger this time around. The central bankers have unleashed a credit monster. $67 trillion in the US, $40 trillion or more in China & $230 trillion on a global basis. http://bit.ly/2oPaRPO
- Trump is right about one thing – the massive trade deficits are a problem. In fact, the twin deficits in trade and the federal budget will doom the stock market. But Trump is wrong in thinking tariffs are going to solve the problem. http://bit.ly/2FttcMu
- US Has Been in Recession for Entirety of Obama Presidency (Video) @SchiffGold http://bit.ly/1SXwaVy
- I added a video to a @YouTube playlist http://bit.ly/2kSKre5 🔴 What's Good For Gold in 2018 May Be Bad For Bitcoin
- http://bit.ly/1M785wD
- http://bit.ly/1MMOilc
- My latest @RealAlexJones interview – Yellen Backtracks as US Heads to Next Recession @SchiffGold https://t.co/zEEHYhozpg
- JP Morgan says not to worry about rising interest rates. I guess they think the problem is contained. Are these guys really this dumb, or are they just trying to talk up the market?
Thursday, November 26, 2015
I wanted feedback on this idea.
I have a concept in my head for a digital currency that distributes dividends based on velocity. Now let's say every transaction had a 1% deposit on both ends that automatically distributed the money to all users immediately and unconditionally without any bureaucratic meddling. This would be enough to phase out welfare and social security in the long run. Depending on velocity it could be anywhere between $10 and $90 a day. This would be a natural pigovian tax on fractional reserve lending to pay for the inflation they're creating. Money laundering, capital flight, paying off debt with debt and other harmfully redundant bureaucratic schemes would pay for damage to the economy. NYSE crash bots would be prohibitively expensive. I suppose it would be fair to call this a redistribution scheme, but it wouldn't be fair to call this class warfare. It's about as egalitarian as it gets. Everybody pays 1% when money changes hands, no ifs ands or buts, both deadbeat and bankster alike. Please be my guest and tear this apart. I'd like to hear your take on it and hear what folly this may entail.