link: http://ift.tt/1XuSw2U
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- Anyone dumb enough not to use every legal deduction to minimize his income tax liability is not smart enough to be president!
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- Keynesian Hedge Fund Manager Ray Dalio Agrees with Peter Schiff on Fed's Next Move @SchiffGold https://t.co/96aepOXtlI
- UBS Says It's Time to 'Warm Up' to Gold @SchiffGold http://t.co/ZBtHRx7WS5
- Debate-Inequality: Should We Care?
- In quoting Adams about the failures of democracy #Romney forgot to mention that America was founded as a Republic for those very reasons!
- My speech at The Jackson Hole Summit last month. @SchiffGold http://t.co/AVPdZNaY5x
- U.S. wages rose by just .2% in the 2nd quarter, the weakest growth since 1982, shocking markets that had expected a rise of .6%.
- What American would hire an accountant, then ignore his advice to utilize legal deductions, and pay more income taxes then are legally owed?
- By not answering the question, #Clinton avoided stating whether the Constitution means what it says, or what justices pretend it says.
Thursday, November 26, 2015
I wanted feedback on this idea.
I have a concept in my head for a digital currency that distributes dividends based on velocity. Now let's say every transaction had a 1% deposit on both ends that automatically distributed the money to all users immediately and unconditionally without any bureaucratic meddling. This would be enough to phase out welfare and social security in the long run. Depending on velocity it could be anywhere between $10 and $90 a day. This would be a natural pigovian tax on fractional reserve lending to pay for the inflation they're creating. Money laundering, capital flight, paying off debt with debt and other harmfully redundant bureaucratic schemes would pay for damage to the economy. NYSE crash bots would be prohibitively expensive. I suppose it would be fair to call this a redistribution scheme, but it wouldn't be fair to call this class warfare. It's about as egalitarian as it gets. Everybody pays 1% when money changes hands, no ifs ands or buts, both deadbeat and bankster alike. Please be my guest and tear this apart. I'd like to hear your take on it and hear what folly this may entail.