link: http://ift.tt/1jsO5bz
Hot And Trending...
Trending
- March report "How Revolutions, Wars and Plagues are Harbingers of 'Great Changes' in Societies and in Economics" published. http://bit.ly/2y4LJZQ
- My CNBC Asia interview last night: Whole World Has Been Fooled by the Fed’s Con @SchiffGold http://t.co/YcOF0AiN2O
- CEO who raised price of drug by 5000%
- Success At Business Does Not Imply Knowledge of Economics
- The new Federal Reserve chairman said he sees little risk of recession and reaffirmed plans to continue tightening the money supply through interest rate increases and quantitative tightening. http://bit.ly/2t0uYjn
- My latest Newsmax interview: Stock Market 'Very Dangerous' Right Now Due to Fed Antics @SchiffGold https://t.co/Naal2dbZYR
- This new video blog goes out to Scott Nations – It's 2006 All Over Again @SchiffGold http://t.co/ikz3TItPOz
- Peter Schiff, now in 60FPS!
- Anyone dumb enough not to use every legal deduction to minimize his income tax liability is not smart enough to be president!
- Welcome to Obama’s Grand Jobs Recovery: Part-Time Work for Everyone! https://t.co/q5B2MJxscg @SchiffGold
Sunday, November 29, 2015
Economics in One Lesson
The case against government-guaranteed loans and mortgages to private businesses and persons is almost as strong as, though less obvious than, the case against direct government loans and mortgages. The advocates of government-guaranteed mortgages also forget that what is being lent is ultimately real capital, which is limited in supply, and that they are helping identified B at the expense of some unidentified A. Gov-Guar home mortgages, especially when a negligible down payment or no down payment whatever is required, inevitably mean more bad loans than otherwise. They force the general taxpayer to subsidize the bad risks and defray the losses. They encourage people to “buy” houses that they cannot really afford. They tend to eventually to bring about an oversupply of houses as compared with other things. They temporarily overstimulate building, raise the cost of building for everybody, and may mislead the building industry into an eventually costly overexpansion. In brief, in the long run they do not increase overall national production but encourage malinvestment.